Thursday, June 9, 2011

Andrew Breitbart Releases X-Rated Weiner Pic After Saying He Wouldn't


For over a week, headlines involving lewd messages, first allegedly sent by Congressman Weiner and then later admittedly by the congressman, have dominated the news. The story was spearheaded by conservative propagandist Andrew Breitbart on his extreme right-leaning websites. Considering the source (and the target), the story was suspect, but sadly Breitbart released something factual but it didn’t take long for him to slip back into his sleazy ways.

It all began to fall apart when Breitbart released a topless photo of Weiner on his website Big Government on June 6th, which seemingly prompted the congressman to call a press conference to address the situation once and for all. Breitbart, who was coincidentally in New York and nearby the location of the press conference, decided to crash the event and hold a press conference of his own using Weiner’s podium. Breitbart cried about how great a guy he was for trying to “save” Weiner’s family and how he was just being a good little journalist, but then Breitbart began to slip back into his dirty ways extorting the congressman, saying “if this guy wants to start fighting with me again, I have this photo.”

Breitbart was referring to an alleged x-rated photo of the congressman.

Oh yeah. He also played the victim card, insisting this story stole his family’s Memorial Day weekend (I wonder what it did to Anthony Weiner’s).

Breitbart again said, on NBC’s “Today” show the next day, that the photo was indeed “insurance” should the congressman ever speak up, but then reassured interviewer Matt Lauer that he had no plans of releasing the photo – presumably to cover his ass against legal action. Breitbart did however beat around the bush saying there may be certain circumstances in which he may feel obligated to release the photo.

Remember. Breitbart is just trying to save Weiner’s family.

Read the rest at Veracity Stew!

2 comments:

  1. You lefties are such clowns......you actually try to make a victim out of Weiner in this....deflect, deflect, deflect...that's your mantra. It doesn't matter WHAT Breitbart said...it's his property and he can do what he wants with it. You name me one journalist, left or right, that ISN'T a sleaze bag....DAN RATHER ANYONE?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's look at your comment!

    "You lefties are such clowns"

    I'm a moderate Republican, but I guess I am left to those on the far far right.

    "you actually try to make a victim out of Weiner in this"

    No I don't. I disapproved of Weiner's actions (as I have stated before) and am simply pointing out Breitbart is a liar and a scum bag, which you seem to admit in your last sentence.

    "It doesn't matter WHAT Breitbart said...it's his property and he can do what he wants with it."

    Really? First, how is a picture taken by Weiner of Weiner's wiener Breitbart's property? Secondly, You say it is Breitbart's property and he could "do what he wants with it," so by that logic, it was Weiner's property first, and he could do what he wants to do with it, which he chose to mail it to his girl pals on Facebook/Twitter, so why are you defending Breitbart and attacking Weiner?

    "You name me one journalist, left or right, that ISN'T a sleaze bag....DAN RATHER ANYONE?"

    As I pointed out before, you admit Breitbart is a sleaze, but, you reference Dan Rather so I assume you are referring to his use unauthenticated documents and standing by them as truth. He may have made the mistake of believing forged documents to be the real thing, but then again, how different is that from Breitbart publishing heavily edited videos or lying about Shirley Sherrod in another... oh yeah... you already admitted Breitbart is a scumbag...

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts and experiences in relation to this post. Remember to be respectful in your posting. Comments that that are deemed inappropriate will be deleted.