Saturday, March 26, 2011

Wisconsin Republicans Publish Collective Bargaining Law, Claim It Is Official Despite Judge's Ruling

Here is an excerpt from an article by Patrick Marley and Jasont Stein from the Journal Sentinel:
In a stunning twist, Gov. Scott Walker's legislation limiting collective bargaining for public workers was published Friday despite a judge's hold on the measure, prompting a dispute over whether it takes effect Saturday.

The measure was published to the Legislature's website with a footnote that acknowledges the restraining order by a Dane County judge. But the posting says state law "requires the Legislative Reference Bureau to publish every act within 10 working days after its date of enactment."

The measure sparked protests at the Capitol and lawsuits by opponents because it would eliminate the ability of most public workers to bargain over anything but wages.

The restraining order was issued against Democratic Secretary of State Doug La Follette. But the bill was published by the reference bureau, which was not named in the restraining order.

Laws normally take effect a day after they are published, and a top GOP lawmaker said that meant it will become law Saturday. But nonpartisan legislative officials from two agencies, including the one who published the bill, disagreed.

"I think this is a ministerial act that forwards it to the secretary of state," said Stephen Miller, director of the Legislative Reference Bureau. "I don't think this act makes it become effective. My understanding is that the secretary of state has to publish it in the (official state) newspaper for it to become effective."

Walker signed the bill March 11. Under state law, it must be published within 10 working days, which was Friday.

It hasn't been printed in the Wisconsin State Journal, the official state newspaper, as other laws are. Late Friday, State Journal publisher Bill Johnston said in an e-mail that the notice for the law had been scheduled to run but had been canceled. He did not elaborate.

La Follette urged caution Friday, saying the measure has not been published yet by his office. He said he believes the law cannot go into effect until he directs the State Journal to publish it, which he has not done.

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) said it didn't matter that it hasn't appeared in the paper.

"It's published," Fitzgerald said. "It's law. That's what I contend."

Fitzgerald and Miller met Friday. Miller said Fitzgerald asked him to publish the law and, after reading the statutes, Miller agreed that he could do so. He said he had never published a law without being given a date by the secretary of state during his 12 years of running the reference bureau.

After the restraining order was issued March 18, La Follette sent a letter that same day to the reference bureau rescinding earlier instructions to publish the bill Friday. "I further instruct you to remove all reference to March 25, 2011, as the publication date and not to proceed with publication until I contact you with a new publication date," his letter said.
I find this very interesting - while there is a restraining order in place by a judge, the Republicans are playing with semantics in order to get their way and the Walker administration is already planning to enforce the law, which I thought was also interesting because of comments made by Walkers top cabinet administration official, Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch:

"Today the administration was notified that the LRB published the budget-repair bill as required by law," he said. "The administration will carry out the law as required."

Remember when Democrats fled the state because the legislature could not vote on budgetary matters without the higher quorom, but then they claimed the collective bargaining was later not a budgetary item in order to pass it without the Democrat's votes?

Don't you love how the Republicans say it is one thing, then say a completely different thing to get their way, only to go back to what they were saying in the first place?

1 comment:

  1. The last time I checked, the Wisconsin Secretary of State was part of the executive branch. Currently, there is a temporary restraining order against him. If Walker enforces this law, he as the head executive, is in violation of the order. Appellate courts do not like lower court orders violated, even if they are wrong. When you take the law into your own hands, you are not only questioning the lower court's ruling, but the power of the courts in general. Walker better hope he wins this appeal and he is not getting off to a good start. He may learn what a "show cause" order is and believe me, it is not grade school show and tell.


Please share your thoughts and experiences in relation to this post. Remember to be respectful in your posting. Comments that that are deemed inappropriate will be deleted.